The Supreme Court is currently deliberating the implications of state abortion bans in the wake of the historic Roe v. Wade decision. Idaho, among 14 states with strict abortion bans at all stages of pregnancy, is under scrutiny as conservative justices question whether these bans violate federal healthcare law.
Despite arguments from the Biden administration that federal law should override state bans in emergency cases, Idaho contends that their law includes exceptions for life-saving abortions. However, this ban has already had a significant impact on emergency care, with reports of pregnant women being turned away from U.S. emergency rooms on the rise.
The Idaho abortion ban makes performing the procedure a felony punishable by up to five years in prison, sparking dueling protests outside the Supreme Court over abortion rights. While liberal justices argue that the law puts women’s health at risk, conservative justices remain skeptical of any violations of federal law.
The Justice Department has brought a case against Idaho under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act, but a federal judge’s initial ruling in favor of legal abortions in medical emergencies was overridden by the Supreme Court allowing the law to take full effect in January.
Another abortion case seeking to restrict access to abortion medication is still pending, further complicating the landscape of reproductive rights in the United States. The Supreme Court is expected to rule on the Idaho case by the end of June, potentially setting a precedent for the future of abortion rights across the country.
“Travel aficionado. Incurable bacon specialist. Tv evangelist. Wannabe internet enthusiast. Typical creator.”